AGITATION by the youths of Lokpaukwu Umuchieze community in Ummnneochi Council Area of Abia State is gradually building tension in the area. The cause of the tension, which is threatening the peace of the state and the granite-rich community, is the alleged disobedience of a court order by two mining companies.
A visit to the community last Friday revealed the youths were spoiling for war over the alleged disobedience to the Federal High Court Order, which stopped the two mining firms, Asphalt Unity Construction Limited, a Lebanese company and Pioneer Sinochino Investment Venture Limited, a Chinese company from operating at the Aguokeakpu quarry land of Amaubiri/ Umutu in the community.
Meanwhile, leaders and major stakeholders in the community have urged the Assistant Inspector General of Police to wade into the matter and ensure the court order was obeyed to avoid breakdown of law and order.
Trouble started following disagreement between the 35 landowners of the mining field and the two mining firms, over which of them has the legal right of mining the particular site, which led to the matter being taken to court.
As a result, Justice F. A. Olubanjo of the Federal High Court, Umuahia, in his ruling in the application, ordered that the parties maintain the status quo. He went further to explain that the order meant that “whatever acts have been completed remain so until this court otherwise so order.”
The youths, who spearheaded the agitation, said they had observed that Pioneer Sinochino had been flouting the court order by operating on the site despite the court order.
They alleged that the company entered the disputed area from an adjoining land and had been mining stones and granite despite the court order.
Confronted with the allegation of flouting court order, Public Relations Officer of Pioneer Sinochino, Arinze Nwafor, denied his firm was flouting the court order. Throwing more light on the matter, Nwafor said the court order stated that status quo be maintained, and that they were already operating in the disputed area before the order, hence they were still within the order.
0 comments :
Post a Comment